I know this has been discussed before, I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with one working better than the other for their child? I've always thought that they were supposed to be basically the same, but some of the things I've seen with my daughters numbers lately are making me question that. We've used humalog since dx. Around this past Dec-Jan, we were having a hard time with highs (while on humalog). Constantly increasing basals, running temp basal increases, site changes less than 48 hours apart just to try to stay on top of it. We also moved at the end of Nov., so i thought maybe the stress of starting a new school, excitement about Christmas, and things in general being crazy were contributing to her numbers being wacky. Insurance only covered Novolog after Jan., so we ended up switching to that mid-Jan, and it seemed like things had finally settled down with her numbers. We were even starting to forget when the last site change happened bc things were going so smoothly. Now we are on an insurance plan that covers humalog. In the past 2 weeks that we have been using this new vial of humalog, the craziness seems to be creeping back in. She seems to be running high more often than not. We see the endo on thursday, I'm wondering if I should get a script for novolog and try to appeal to insurance to have it covered. Any thoughts on this? I swear I saw a post recently about humalog causing more issues with sites for someone but I can't seem to find it now.