advertisement

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: ViaCyte Clinical Trial News: VC-01 is Fully Enrolled, VC-02 Starts

  1. #1

    Default ViaCyte Clinical Trial News: VC-01 is Fully Enrolled, VC-02 Starts

    This blog posting covers two important pieces of news from ViaCyte.

    ViaCyte's Phase-II Trial of VC-01 is Not Recruiting
    (But What does that mean?)


    I missed this news, when it was announced back in May 2017, but ViaCyte's Phase-II clinical trial of VC-01 is not recruiting more people. I'm not sure if this is a "pause" between their phase-I group and their phase-II group, or if they have finished recruiting all people for both groups. That's important because they are gathering effectiveness data for six months. So whatever group they finished recruiting in May, they should have effectiveness data in November. Effectiveness data for 15 people would be good, but from the full 65 people would be even better. Since this trial is not blinded (and has no control group), they could publish their data as soon as they have it, if they want to.

    Also, they are gathering safety data for two years, so that same group will finish gathering safety data in May 2019. The same "15 people is good 65 people is better" and "with no control group, they can publish if they wish" applies to this safety data as well.

    Clinical Trial Registery: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02239354

    Differences Between ViaCyte's VC-01 and VC-02 Treatments

    ViaCyte has started a clinical trial for their VC-02 stem cell implantation product, but as this treatment is not a cure (by my definition of "cure"), I will not be following it. Don't mix up VC-02 with their earlier VC-01 product. VC-01 is a potential cure, and I will follow it moving forward.

    I found this confusing: why would a company test a non-cure after they had a cure already in the pipeline, and ahead of the non-cure? Why even bother with the non-cure?

    While VC-01 and VC-02 are encapsulated stem cells, the nature of the encapsulation is completely different. VC-01 uses a "strong" encapsulation which prevents the body's immune system from attacking the new cells. This prevents both the normal rejection (ie. the foreign organ reaction), and type-1 rejection (ie. the malfunctioning autoantibody reaction) from attacking the new cells. Therefore, VC-01 does not require anti-rejection drugs. VC-02 uses a "weak" encapsulation which holds the stem cells together and in one place, and encourages new blood vessels to integrate into the encapsulation, but provides no immune protection. People getting VC-02 will need to take anti-rejection drugs [d1].

    Both VC-01 and VC-02 have the same cells inside. They both start with ViaCyte's PEC-01 cells. These are created by harvesting human embryonic stem cells from a long-existing culture and treating them so they differentiate into pancreatic cells. The cells that are inside the devices are these pancreatic cells. (There are no "raw" stem cells in the device.) This process is described on ViaCyte's web site here:
    http://viacyte.com/technology/stem-cell-engineering/

    The obvious question is, why would any person with type-1 diabetes choose to be in the VC-02 trial, if they could be in the VC-01 trial? The immunosuppression required by VC-02 has known bad side effects, and there are known risks in taking those drugs for decades.

    First is that the VC-01 trial is not recruiting right now. So if you want an encapsulated ViaCyte stem cell treatment right now, VC-02 is your only option. I don't know if the VC-01 trial is completely enrolled, or if it will open up again, to gather a second group of patients.

    Second is this: The ViaCyte team believes that the reason some implanted beta cells work and some fail is "vascularization". Vascularization is the body's ability to grow blood vessels into the new beta cells so that they can get oxygen, remove waste products, and generally integrate with the host person. ViaCyte believes that the encapsulation used in VC-01 will allow this vascularization and therefore be successful. However, they also believe that VC-02 will have even better vascularization, and therefore an even higher chance of success. So if someone currently has type-1 diabetes, they may choose to have VC-02 because it has a higher chance of success (even if this is a trade off against a known higher risk from the treatment).

    The VC-02 Study

    Although there is only one official clinical trial of VC-02, there are two patient groups within this trial (which they call "cohorts"), and these cohorts are really separate phase-I and phase-II trials. It's just that one clinical trial registry covers both. The first cohort will be 15 patients, all of whom will get a low dose version of the treatment. The second cohort will be 40 patients, all of whom will get a higher dose version of the treatment. There is no control group. They expect to finish the second cohort in Dec 2020.

    They are collecting their primary safety data at 4 months post transplant, and primary effectiveness data (C-peptide data) at 6 months post transplant.

    They are recruiting at two sites:


    • University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States, 92121
      Contact: Study Coordinator 1-844-317-STEM (7836) alphastemcellclinic@ucsd.edu
    • University of Minnesota Recruiting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
      Contact: Study Coordinator 612-626-4993 kreel001@umn.edu


    Clinical Trial Registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163511
    ViaCyte's FAQs: http://viacyte.com/clinical/faqs/

    Joshua Levy
    http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com
    publicjoshualevy at gmail dot com
    All the views expressed here are those of Joshua Levy, and nothing here is official JDRF or JDCA news, views, policies or opinions. My daughter has type-1 diabetes and participates in clinical trials, which might be discussed here. My blog contains a more complete non-conflict of interest statement. Thanks to everyone who helps with the blog.

  2. #2

    Default

    Joshua, I believe they stopped recruiting people for Phase II for the PEC-Encap product (VC01) because they found problems with the encapsulation material. There is still hope that they can improve the material. But unfortunately there will be a two year delay in the research.

    Here is a quote from an article describing the problem with the PEC-Encap product: "we didn't see the kind of robust and consistent engraftment that we needed to see. The devices were not becoming sufficiently well vascularized to sustain those cells over the long term"

    Here is the full article: https://seekingalpha.com/article/406...icial-pancreas

    In my opinion this encapsulation research being done by companies like BioHub and Viacyte are the best hope we have for a functional cure.

  3. #3

    Default

    rhill: thanks for the update. I heard something similar from a different source after I posted that blog. --Joshua

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
advertisement