Return to Children with Diabetes  

Go Back   Children with Diabetes Forums > Products > Continuous Glucose Sensing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-24-2009, 08:10 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Approved members
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 9,436
Default Another lack of Accuracy Question

So, last night her accuracy was beautiful. She was 90, but knowing her activity, I gave her a temp basal decrease to keep her from going lower. Well, she got down to 78, with the CGMS alarming at 79 - I thought, I LOVE this thing. We treated. The darn thing went off every 10 minutes (at 1 am!), but I decided to wait it out, well 30 minutes later, it starts alarming that she is 70 again. I was surprised so I tested, and she was 169.


I am jsut surprised that the CGMS caught the low but not the going back up? We recalibrate, and she woke up this morning at 104, with the CGMS saying 103.

So, does the CGMS usually not catch the going back up after a low? I was suprised by the 30 minute lag time.
__________________
I'm still here.
DD - 15 - Lantus and MM Pump/Dex G4
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2009, 08:12 AM
hawkeyegirl hawkeyegirl is offline
Approved members
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,947
Default

It does lag behind, but it should have come up by then. Was she laying on the sensor?

We have our low "re-alarm" set to 45 minutes. It avoids having it realarm every 10 minutes at night!
__________________
Mom to J., age 9
Dx 2007 @ age 3
MM Revel and CGM
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2009, 04:32 PM
Darryl's Avatar
Darryl Darryl is offline
Approved members
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee View Post
So, last night her accuracy was beautiful. She was 90, but knowing her activity, I gave her a temp basal decrease to keep her from going lower. Well, she got down to 78, with the CGMS alarming at 79 - I thought, I LOVE this thing. We treated. The darn thing went off every 10 minutes (at 1 am!), but I decided to wait it out, well 30 minutes later, it starts alarming that she is 70 again. I was surprised so I tested, and she was 169.


I am jsut surprised that the CGMS caught the low but not the going back up? We recalibrate, and she woke up this morning at 104, with the CGMS saying 103.

So, does the CGMS usually not catch the going back up after a low? I was suprised by the 30 minute lag time.
Lee,

You'll probably come to find that when treating lows, you just give the carbs you think are necessary, then wait about an hour to see the result on the CGM before correcting again. For some reason, lows treated with carbs can be slow to reflect in the interstial fluid. And if you correct twice, you get a high an hour later.

We get a handle on how many points BG goes up per carb (8 in our case), then look at the CGM trend. If low but flat, we just give the estimated carbs. If dropping more quickly, we project where the low will be 15 minutes later based on the CGM reading, and give enough carbs for that (no more). If we think that an over-bolus or over-basal is the problem, then we add the # of carbs to cover the estimated excess insulin. Usually our dd's lows are corrected using 1-5 carbs, then hour later all looks well.
__________________
Dad to Leah and Anna, married to Pam
Leah is 14, dx 1/1/07 at age 8, Type 1 and Celiac, Omnipod since 3/2007 Guardian CGM since 4/2007

CGMS Calibration - DCCT: The Study That Forever Changed Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes - Improved Glycemic Control in T1 children Using Real-Time CGMS
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Forum Reminder
You registered and accepted the terms of use before joining this forum. Please note that this is an open forum, which means messages are posted live--with no review prior to posting. Messages are the opinion of the person posting, and posts may or may not be accurate. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Legal Notice, Privacy Policy, and Safe Harbor Policy.

© Children with Diabetes, Inc. 1995-2013.