PDA

View Full Version : UK Diabetes soars in the under fives


Ellen
03-16-2007, 09:56 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6455653.stm

Diabetes soars in the under fives

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42686000/jpg/_42686945_diabetessplcred.jpg People with type 1 diabetes require insulin therapy

The number of young children with Type 1 diabetes has risen dramatically in the last 20 years, a study suggests.
The number of under-fives with the condition increased five-fold - meaning it affected one child in every 1,000 by 2004, a study around Oxford found.
Other studies have revealed similar rises, suggesting the trend is true for the whole of the UK, Diabetes UK said.
The Bristol University team blame genes and environmental factors, including unhealthy diets loaded with sugar.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gifhttp://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/start_quote_rb.gif It must be due to changes in our environment http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/v3/end_quote_rb.gif


Researcher Professor Polly Bingley


The number of under-15s with the condition almost doubled during the study, which focused on 2.6 million people in and around the Oxford region between 1985 and 2004.
Type 1 diabetes, also referred to insulin-dependent diabetes, generally develops in childhood and often runs in families.
In contrast, the far more common Type 2 diabetes tends to develop later in life and is largely linked to lifestyle factors such as obesity.
Of the estimated more than two million people with diabetes in the UK, around 250,000 have Type 1.
At least 20,000 children of school age in the UK have Type 1, according to the charity Diabetes UK.
Sign of the times
Lead researcher Professor Polly Bingley said the rate of childhood Type 1 diabetes was increasing all over Europe, particularly in the very young.
She said the increase was too steep to be put down to genetic factors alone.
"So it must be due to changes in our environment.
"This could either mean that we are being exposed to something new, or that we now have reduced exposure to something that was previously controlling our immune responses."
She suggested that fewer mums opting to breastfeed their babies might be a factor.
Children's diets have also changed, with more convenience and snack foods available.
Another possibility is that children are being exposed to fewer germs, affecting the development of their immune systems.
"We now need to work to identify what these changes might be." She presented her findings at Diabetes UK's annual conference. Simon O'Neill, director of care, information and advocacy services for the charity, added: "Whilst 10 to 14-year-olds remain the largest group for diagnosis, the rise in cases found in children under five is worrying."

Boo
03-16-2007, 10:49 AM
Boy, this makes me feel very conflicted. I wouldn't wish T1 on ANYBODY, but on the other hand, it gives me much hope that lots of $$ and time/energy will go toward future research!

And, for the record, my T1 child was breastfed and exposed to at least his share of germs, I'm sure. I did (do) tend to rely on convenience foods a lot, but am trying hard now to go a different route there!

LantusFiend
03-16-2007, 12:30 PM
In the US it seems to me that breastfeeding has been on the rise in the last twenty years... that it hit a low more than twenty years ago when doctors claimed that formula was better. My parents were bottle fed; my brothers and I were breastfed.
Little kids get MORE exposure to germs these days because of daycare and older siblings in schools and stuff like that, but not necessarily in a changing way.
I saw a study that linked mild vitamin D deficiency to rates of T1, and breastfed babies are more likely to be vitamin D deficient.
This article (http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/79/3/362) talks about vitamin D.

Brensdad
03-16-2007, 02:50 PM
I saw this on Yahoo this morning but didn't stop to read it because I just knew it would end up here.

It really makes you wonder if there is something else going on that we haven't figured out yet, but for now here is my 2 cents.

The study cites the increased number of diagnoses in children under the age of 5, and I wonder if the message about T1 is finally getting through to pediatricians. Our pedi was willing to "bet his practice" that Emma didn't have diabetes, and if we weren't insistent on the test we might not have known until she was in full DKA.

Perhaps the number of diagnoses has gone up because doctors are doing a better job of spotting it early? Either way, I don't see how we can ignore the argument for the role in environmental factors.

Val
03-16-2007, 03:15 PM
In the US it seems to me that breastfeeding has been on the rise in the last twenty years... that it hit a low more than twenty years ago when doctors claimed that formula was better. My parents were bottle fed; my brothers and I were breastfed.
Little kids get MORE exposure to germs these days because of daycare and older siblings in schools and stuff like that, but not necessarily in a changing way.
I saw a study that linked mild vitamin D deficiency to rates of T1, and breastfed babies are more likely to be vitamin D deficient.
This article (http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/79/3/362) talks about vitamin D.

hmmm. Interesting thoughts....in Simon's case, he was breastfed but we gave him a liquied supplement (Trivasol) vitamin that included Vit D & iron. I think this practice is fairly common for breasted kids - anyone else?

thebestnest5
03-16-2007, 06:14 PM
Liv was breastfed and I took supplements and was outside in the sunshine to activate vitamin D. Of course, MN/ND winters are limited for sunshine.

My BIL has MS and vitamin D deficiency is suspect in those diagnosed with MS.

It seems like research keeps looking at the *same* things over and over..."just polishing the same old rock over and over again." :confused::( :cwds:

muddymessalonskee
03-16-2007, 06:31 PM
Grr. I get really irritated whenever I read about the "breastfeeding connection". I breastfed all three babies for a *long* time, and the two oldest have D! We also fed them organic food (not exclusively) and tried to minimize their exposure to common toxins like those found in many house cleaning products, etc.

Deborah

Momof4gr8kids
03-16-2007, 06:53 PM
Julia was breastfed until she was 15 mo. We've never had a very sugary diet, and eat out way less then the national average. Her dad also has type 1, so I am sure that genetics are a big part of it, at least in our family. Our son Joey has the antibodies. I have recently been reading on why some people do have the antidoies, but never get dx'd with type 1. There are a lot of interesting theories out there.

Barry
03-16-2007, 10:04 PM
Breastfeeding or lack there of causes D....give me a break. What next, Al Gore going to correlate D to SUVs?

momof2
03-18-2007, 02:32 PM
Hi all

My theory is this:

It is not the 'd' that is gentic, it is the 'autoimmune' process. That can take shape in many forms, and whilst none of my family have 'd' there is thyroidism, and chrohns disease, and food allergies amongst the family, all of which are 'autoimmune' conditions.

I'd welcome comments from others on this.

Regards

Nelson
03-18-2007, 03:07 PM
Okay, just to add one more data point:
- Derek was breast fed for over a year.
- Derek never even tasted formula or milk other than mom's for at least a year
- Our house is a pig sty and has never been particularly clean
- We have never eaten particularly carefully, and we have never snacked extensively on junk food.
- I don't buy any of the easy environmental speculations being put forth!!
- We have plenty of allergies on both sides of the family
- Two identical twin aunts (dad's sisters) were diabetic, but no other history of it.

- The under 5 year old thing sounds to me like we are just getting better an early identification of the problem, if there is often over a year long development time for the disease.
- Is there still a similar change in t1 frequency when we look at it for people under 20?
- Has anyone (I'm sure they have, but I haven't seen it) looked at any changes in frequency of certain viral infections that are otherwise relatively benign, but may be linked to the onset of type-1?
- What about correlations with changes in standard medical practices for dealing with things like ear infections (using more or less antibiotics)?

Yaaker
03-18-2007, 03:10 PM
Kristopher was breastfed,and Kris was a "food freak" while pregnant,and after he was born,she checked everything that went in the mouth (first baby!:rolleyes: ) He got to eat out very little & and still eats out very little (no fast food places for 50 milees) We live in Montana,so Vit D "could" be a factor...but the little guys been an outdoor junkie since he could walk.
Now our P.A. (who dx'd Kristopher,and is STILL his main Dr for his D) said that 13 other kids had been dx'd in the the couple months prior to Kristopher,now I'm not sure just how big our town is population wise,but it's tiny in the grand scheme of things. Dr Joe said the only thing these kids had in common was that flu that went around last winter (that everybody in our family,in 4 households in 2 towns got) and the chickenpox......he didn't have the chickenpox.....and he had the flu the end of Nov beginning of Dec 2005-he was dx'd in July 2006:( As for the other autoimmune diseases,we do have a TON of allergies in the family,Each one of my kids has or had atleast one (his Mom outgrew her milk allergy,although she still can't drink alot,she no longer gets hives)The other allergies are bees,wheat,eggs,chicken,dust,ephedra,cats just to name a few.BUT nobdoys had type one as far back as I or his other Grandma can remember.......so I cast my vote on that NASTY flu bug taking out his pancreas......... Oh and I might add,Dr Joe said Kristopher was like the last one dx'd.....and it was about 6 months after that flu,so that means his "GOOD" immune system (which he had up until this dx:confused: ) fought off the d,just like he fought off all his little sisters colds & flus.Lori

momof2
03-18-2007, 03:43 PM
Ben had a virus that came and went for about 8 months prior to 'd', and it brought him out in severe 'hives'. There were no explanations for the hives - except for 'virus'.

I'm certain that kicked off the 'd', albeit I'm still certain that the 'autoimmunity' came into it's own then, if that makes sense.


Regards

Anne
03-18-2007, 05:20 PM
Hi Jackie,
Like you, we can find absolutely no diabetes (Type 1 or 2) on either side but do have autoimmune diseases and allergies. Anyone know if there is a proven link?
Anne